Music is the sole domain in which man realizes the present. By the imperfection of his nature, man is doomed to submit to the passage of time — to its categories of past and future — without ever being able to give substance, and therefore stability, to the category of the present.
The phenomenon of music is given to us with the sole purpose of establishing an order in things, including, and particularly, the coordination between man and time.
Case study: «4’33» by John Cage
The first part of the unit is devoted to the physics of sound and how we perceive sound, how our acoustic and cognitive apparatus is structured, how we process sonic material, and how this affects what and how we hear. The formation of human listening takes us back thousands of years, to times when proto-singing preceded speech. Students learn about research on the listening abilities of Neanderthals, archaeological discoveries related to sound production and musical instruments, and the views of traditional cultures on the role of listening.
Next, we will examine how listening norms and behaviors have been shaped by society. In 18th-century Europe, boisterous crowds treated operas and plays as background amusement. Yet by the 20th century, strict silence became expected during performances. Primary sources documenting premieres from Lully to Mahler will showcase how listening norms were transformed between the 18th and 20th centuries.
As a case study, students will recreate a Mozart symphony premiere from the perspective of its original audience. Ultimately, these investigations will reveal that listening experiences are informed by a complex interplay of acoustic science, culture, history, and individual perception.
Further reading:
Steven Mithen “The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind, and Body”
Mark Changizi «Harnessed. How Language and Music Mimicked Nature and Transformed Ape to Man»
Daniel Levitin "This Is Your Brain on Music: The Science of a Human Obsession"In this unit, we'll explore the longstanding discussion around music's expressive qualities and potential for meaning, known as the "absolute music" debate. Does instrumental music carry set meanings or narratives? Participants will trace key points in this debate, from myths of Orpheus to the dispute between Richard Wagner and Eduard Hanslick, to Igor Stravinsky's statements denying music's power. This discourse encompasses Pythagorean beliefs about microcosm and macrocosm, medieval music theorists' views, early opera creators, Kant's critiques, Romantic ideas of music's superpowers, and concepts of rhetoric and mimesis in music - all of which can be found, in varying proportions, in modern listening concepts.
Students will test and discuss theoretical arguments about music's expressive power by analyzing select works of Bach, Vivaldi, Marin Marais, and C.P.E Bach. They also try their hand at a Harvard Music Lab experiment on guessing song genres using a large dataset of traditional songs (lullabies, love songs, dance songs, healing songs). Attempts to "decode" meaning embedded in music will also be discussed using Iranian classical music and Azerbaijani mugham. Mugham scales, gūshehs, dastgāh parts can convey meaning understood by tradition bearers, without necessarily being universal.Unit 7 covers music's non-syntactic elements and noticeable constructions passed down through centuries, signaling meaning and emotion. Non-syntactic elements (dynamics, density, register, duration, timbre, pauses) are more universal across traditions and genres. Dynamic pairs (tension-repose, variety-unity, motion-stability) offer another analytical and listening strategy. Through pauses and "energy" flow, participants comparatively study Gesualdo madrigals, Webern variations, and Ornette Coleman's free jazz. Linearity and non-linearity concepts arise via temporal listening - music as abstract, temporal sonic shapes simultaneously moving through and creating time, generating internal (syntactical) and external (symbolic) meanings. This enables new performance and analysis opportunities, distinguishing time understanding modes in music.
Numerous sound examples also showcase music dialogue variability (call-and-response, antiphon, Jewish cantorial, polychoral Venetian, fugal proposta-risposta, classical concerto, string quartets, Sufi qawwali, rap battle). And ostinato - the famed repeating basso ostinato idea originating in laments across traditions and woven through Monteverdi to Radiohead.The final unit summarizes prior modules, synthesizing and re-analyzing listening strategies. This knowledge is applied to a concise 20th century music history, spotlighting the listener's role and technologies at each turning point. Through critical reactions to Ligeti's "Le Grand Macabre" opera premiere versus reviews of Debussy, Beethoven, Bizet, and Mussorgsky's works, participants discuss critical reception's role and historical conditioning. The unit concludes by discussing contemporary multimodal listening approaches.
Further listening:
Alex Ross "The Rest is Noise"
Alvin Lucier «Music 109: Notes on Experimental Music»Brendon LaBelle «Acoustic Justice: Listening, Performativity, and the Work of Reorientation»
Polina Proskurina-Yanovich
Philologist
Alexander Gavrilov
Critic, Poet